NDC Waives Anti-Defection Oath for Obi, Kwankwaso
The Nigerian Democratic Congress (NDC) has exempted its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and running mate, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, from a newly introduced anti-defection oath aimed at curbing political defections within the party.
The policy, adopted as part of the party’s internal reforms ahead of the 2027 general elections, requires all candidates seeking elective office on the NDC platform to pledge loyalty to the party and refrain from defecting after winning elections.
Party leaders defended the exemption granted to Obi and Kwankwaso, describing it as a strategic decision linked to the unique circumstances surrounding the formation of the opposition coalition.
According to party sources, both politicians emerged through negotiations involving various political blocs and interest groups that came together under the NDC banner, making their situation distinct from that of other aspirants.
The anti-defection oath was introduced in response to Nigeria’s recurring wave of political defections, which party officials say has weakened opposition parties and altered political balances in legislative bodies.
While the NDC leadership insists the policy is necessary to strengthen party discipline and protect its mandate, the decision to exempt its two highest-profile candidates has generated debate within political circles.
Supporters of the move argue that Obi and Kwankwaso remain central figures in the opposition’s effort to build a formidable challenge against the ruling party in 2027, citing their strong political influence across different regions of the country.
Critics, however, contend that exempting the party’s presidential ticket from a rule imposed on other candidates could create perceptions of unequal treatment within the party.
The NDC has maintained that all other candidates seeking elective positions under its platform must sign the anti-defection oath before receiving final clearance to contest elections.
As preparations for the 2027 polls intensify, the party’s decision is expected to remain a subject of discussion among members and political observers alike.
